Cubic Feet Calculation Explained: How Importers Measure Cargo with Real Examples

Quick answer: To calculate cubic feet for freight, measure the packed item’s outside length × width × height at the longest points. If you measured in inches, multiply L × W × H and divide by 1,728 to get cubic feet (CFT). If you measured in meters, multiply L × W × H to get cubic meters (CBM), then convert CBM × 35.3147 = CFT. Add up all pieces, include pallet/skid dimensions if palletized, and use the total for quotes and container planning.

Why importers rely on cubic feet calculations
Cubic feet drives how you’re quoted, billed, and how well you utilize space in ocean containers and on pallets. Mis-measurement leads to billing disputes, under- or over-booked containers, and avoidable freight spend. This guide explains the formulas, unit conversions, and dimensional/volumetric rules with worked examples so your team can measure consistently, compare LCL¹ vs FCL, and optimize packing decisions.

Common causes of incorrect cargo volume

Mixed units: switching between inches, centimeters, and meters without converting all three dimensions consistently.
Ignoring packaging: measuring product size, not the packed carton or the pallet footprint and total height.
Overhang and compressibility: stretch-wrap bulges or top-box crush reduce or increase actual cube versus plan.
Rounding and tolerance: different rounding rules (to 2 decimals CBM or nearest 0.5 CFT) across providers.
Not summing across mixed sizes: forgetting to calculate each SKU size group and add them.

Step-by-step: how to measure cubes correctly

Decide your measurement unit

Imperial (inches/feet) is common in US pallets and air freight paperwork.
Metric (cm/m) is common at origin factories and in most global ocean documentation.

Measure at the longest points

Length, Width, Height of the packed unit (carton or pallet), including any bulges, corner guards, or overhang.
If palletized, measure the pallet’s footprint and full stack height (including pallet deck height).

Apply the right formula

In inches: CFT = (L × W × H in inches) ÷ 1,728
In feet: CFT = L × W × H in feet
In centimeters: CBM = (L × W × H in cm) ÷ 1,000,000; then CFT = CBM × 35.3147
In meters: CBM = L × W × H in m; then CFT = CBM × 35.3147

Sum across pieces

If all cartons are the same size: CFT total = CFT per carton × quantity.
If mixed sizes: calculate each size group and add.

Apply charging rules to get chargeable weight²

Air freight: dimensional weight (volumetric weight) in kg = CBM × 167. In imperial: volumetric weight in lb = (L × W × H in³) ÷ 166. Chargeable weight = max(actual weight, volumetric weight).
Ocean LCL: charged by “W/M” (weight or measure). 1 revenue ton = 1 CBM or 1,000 kg (whichever is higher). For quoting in imperial, convert CFT to CBM.
Ocean FCL: pay per container; cube tells you if the cargo will fit and informs container choice.

Quick reference conversions

1 foot = 12 inches
1 cubic foot (CFT) = 1,728 cubic inches
1 meter = 100 centimeters = 39.37 inches
1 cubic meter (CBM) ≈ 35.3147 CFT
Air volumetric rules: 1 CBM ≈ 167 kg; 1 ft³ ≈ 4.73 kg (≈ 10.4 lb) under IATA air cargo; some express networks use different divisors (e.g., 139 for in³/lb).

Worked examples importers use daily

Example 1: Single carton in inches (air or LCL quoting)

Carton measured: 24 in × 20 in × 18 in
Volume in cubic inches = 24 × 20 × 18 = 8,640 in³
CFT = 8,640 ÷ 1,728 = 5.00 ft³
If shipping by air: volumetric weight (lb) = 8,640 ÷ 166 ≈ 52.0 lb
- Actual weight is 45 lb → chargeable air weight = 52.0 lb (volumetric dominates)
If LCL ocean: CBM = (24 × 20 × 18 in) convert to meters first
- Convert inches to meters: 24 in = 0.6096 m; 20 in = 0.508 m; 18 in = 0.4572 m
- CBM ≈ 0.6096 × 0.508 × 0.4572 ≈ 0.142 m³
- LCL charge basis uses W/M: compare 0.142 CBM vs weight/1000 kg

Example 2: Palletized shipment (US 48×40 pallet)

Pallet footprint: 48 in × 40 in; pallet height: assume 5 in
Stacked cartons bring total height to 50 in (including pallet)
Total volume in cubic inches = 48 × 40 × 50 = 96,000 in³
CFT = 96,000 ÷ 1,728 ≈ 55.56 ft³ per pallet
If air: volumetric weight (lb) ≈ 96,000 ÷ 166 ≈ 578 lb
If ocean LCL: convert to CBM: CBM ≈ 55.56 ÷ 35.3147 ≈ 1.575 m³
- Revenue ton basis: 1.575 CBM vs weight/1000 kg → charge whichever is greater

What about overhang?

If stretch-wrap bulges add 1 inch on each side: new footprint becomes 49 × 41 × 50 in
New cube = (49 × 41 × 50) ÷ 1,728 ≈ 57.96 ft³ (≈ +4.3% increase)
Small overhang can add measurable chargeable volume—keep edges flush where possible.

Example 3: Mixed cartons, metric measurements

10 cartons: 60 × 40 × 40 cm each → per carton CBM = (60×40×40) ÷ 1,000,000 = 0.096 m³
- Total CBM = 10 × 0.096 = 0.96 m³
- Total CFT = 0.96 × 35.3147 ≈ 33.90 ft³
5 cartons: 50 × 30 × 35 cm each → per carton CBM = (50×30×35)/1,000,000 = 0.0525 m³
- Total CBM for group = 5 × 0.0525 = 0.2625 m³
Shipment total CBM = 0.96 + 0.2625 = 1.2225 m³ → CFT ≈ 43.16 ft³
Air volumetric weight (kg) = 1.2225 × 167 ≈ 204 kg
LCL: revenue tons = 1.2225 CBM vs actual weight/1000 kg

Example 4: “Skid” vs “pallet”

A “skid” may be a simple platform without bottom boards, often lighter and lower profile.
If the skid height is 2 in instead of a 5 in pallet, total stack height drops (e.g., 50 → 47 in).
Using Example 2 footprint (48 × 40), CFT with skid: (48×40×47)/1,728 ≈ 52.22 ft³
Savings per unit ≈ 55.56 − 52.22 = 3.34 ft³ (~6%), which reduces volumetric weight for air and CBM for LCL.

Example 5: Irregular items

Measure at maximum length, width, height bounding box³, not product dimensions alone.
Avoid estimating by “average” shape; carriers charge by the bounding cube.

Tables you can reuse in quotes and packing plans

Typical pallet sizes and indicative cube

Region/Type	Footprint (L×W)	Deck Height	Example Total Height	CFT at Example Height
US Standard	48 in × 40 in	~5 in	50 in	~55.56 ft³
Euro (EUR 1)	1200 mm × 800 mm	~144 mm	1200 mm	CBM ≈ 1.3824; CFT ≈ 48.83
Asia (1100×1100)	1100 mm × 1100 mm	~130 mm	1200 mm	CBM ≈ 1.452; CFT ≈ 51.29

Note: Adjust total height to your real stacking. Always measure after wrapping.

Container interior capacity (approximate; varies by make)

Container Type	Internal Dimensions (L×W×H)	CBM	CFT
20' Standard	~5.9 m × 2.35 m × 2.39 m	~33 m³	~1,165 ft³
40' Standard	~12.03 m × 2.35 m × 2.39 m	~67 m³	~2,366 ft³
40' High Cube⁴	~12.03 m × 2.35 m × 2.69 m	~76 m³	~2,684 ft³
45' High Cube	~13.55 m × 2.35 m × 2.69 m	~86 m³	~3,036 ft³

Use cube numbers for fit planning. Real loadable cube is lower due to voids, door clearance, and palletization.

Air vs sea charging rules (quick lookup)

Mode	How You’re Charged	Key Formula	Practical Implication
International Air	Max(actual weight, volumetric weight)	Volumetric kg = CBM × 167; Volumetric lb ≈ in³ ÷ 166	Low-density cargo costs more than it weighs
Express Parcels	Divisor varies (commonly 139 in³/lb)	Dim weight lb ≈ in³ ÷ 139	Check your carrier’s divisor
Ocean LCL	W/M: per revenue ton (1 CBM or 1,000 kg)	Charge by whichever is greater	Density matters only relative to 1,000 kg/CBM
Ocean FCL	Per container rate	Fit to container cube and weight limits	Optimize packing to reduce wasted space

How cube affects LCL vs FCL decisions

LCL is ideal for smaller volumes (e.g., under ~12–15 CBM) where you pay only for the space used. Above certain thresholds, FCL often becomes cheaper and faster.
Cube also drives handling risk: more pieces and more palletized units mean more touchpoints. FCL can reduce handling and damage at higher volumes.
Use your total CBM/CFT plus expected voids to model container utilization. For pallets, consider clearances and interlocks inside containers.

Simple utilization example

Total CBM = 28 CBM across 18 US pallets
40' High Cube has ~76 CBM gross; but palletized loads may achieve only 60–70% practical utilization due to voids (≈45–53 CBM).
If your 28 CBM fits with smart stacking and double-decking (where allowed), FCL likely beats LCL on cost-per-unit and transit certainty.

Measurement best practices to avoid billing disputes

Measure after packing and wrapping; include pallet/skid height.
Use a single unit set for all three dimensions before converting.
Record dimensions to the nearest 0.5 cm or 0.25 in; keep photos with a tape measure shown.
Share dimension spreadsheets with your forwarder; agree on rounding rules (e.g., CBM to two decimals).
For air, know your carrier’s divisor (166 vs 139) and confirm whether volumetric applies at piece level or shipment level.
For LCL, confirm whether minimum charges or density surcharges apply.

Packing optimization tips that shrink chargeable cube

Right-size cartons: eliminate void space and excessive dunnage⁵; use inserts instead of oversized boxes.
Pallet footprint discipline: keep edges flush to avoid overhang; choose skid height thoughtfully.
Stack height planning: maximize vertical space within carton strength limits; use strapping to prevent bulges.
Standardize on pallet types that interlock efficiently in containers (e.g., 40″ width aligns well with container internal width).
Bundle small items: consolidate into master cartons to reduce handling and air gaps.
Align SKU dimensions to create “modular” layers that minimize voids on a pallet and inside the container.

Case: converting factory metrics to buyer-ready quotes
Scenario: Factory provides carton data in cm.

Data: 30 cartons, each 55 × 45 × 40 cm; actual weight per carton = 18 kg.
Per-carton CBM = (55×45×40) ÷ 1,000,000 = 0.099 m³
Shipment CBM = 30 × 0.099 = 2.97 m³ → CFT ≈ 2.97 × 35.3147 ≈ 104.9 ft³
Air: volumetric kg = 2.97 × 167 ≈ 495 kg; actual weight = 30 × 18 = 540 kg
- Chargeable air weight = max(540, 495) = 540 kg (actual dominates)
LCL: revenue tons = 2.97 CBM vs 540 kg/1000 = 0.54 → LCL charges based on 2.97 CBM

Action: Convert once to CBM and CFT and carry forward. Quote air using chargeable weight, quote LCL by CBM. If running FCL, compare against container utilization.

Attention and limitations

Divisors and rounding can vary by carrier and trade lane. Confirm in writing.
Commodity restrictions (e.g., over-height pallets, hazardous materials) may force different packing and reduce usable cube.
Warehouse measurement tolerance exists; small differences can occur. Keep evidence for reconciliation.
Container weight limits: even if cube fits, weight distribution must meet flooring and axle limits.

Summary and next steps
Cubic feet is simple math that materially impacts your freight spend. Measure the packed item at its longest points, calculate volume using consistent units, convert CBM↔CFT when needed, and apply the correct charging rules for air and ocean. With clean measurements and a few optimization tactics—right-size cartons, disciplined pallet footprints, and smart stacking—you can reduce chargeable space, avoid billing surprises, and choose confidently between LCL and FCL.

Pick one upcoming shipment and run the full check: measure correctly, convert, calculate chargeable weight, and model container fit. Then standardize the measurement and rounding rules with your suppliers and warehouses to lock in savings shipment after shipment.

About Author

Marson Chan

Expert of international shipment and supply chain management

Cubic Feet Calculation Explained: How Importers Measure Cargo with Real Examples

Table of Contents

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

About Author

Marson Chan

Get a Quote

Recent Posts